1.0IBJ - IJEhttps://ibj.be/fr/Patricia De Bruynhttps://ibj.be/fr/author/patricia-debruyn/Personal Data, Interrupted - IBJ - IJErich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="qgyo1NBjd3"><a href="https://ibj.be/fr/partnerblog-fr/personal-data-interrupted/">Personal Data, Interrupted</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://ibj.be/fr/partnerblog-fr/personal-data-interrupted/embed/#?secret=qgyo1NBjd3" width="600" height="338" title="« Personal Data, Interrupted » — IBJ - IJE" data-secret="qgyo1NBjd3" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script>
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://ibj.be/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
</script>
Since the Court of Justice’s September judgment in EDPS v Single Resolution Board (C-413/23 P, ‘SRB Case’), the discussion on the notion of personal data has hardly slowed, and practitioners keep adding fresh voices on the likely consequences of the verdict. The discussion has also been enriched by proposed amendments to the GDPR and the Regulation 2018/1725 resulting from the latest Digital Omnibus proposal.