Partnerblog

Stibbe organises a webinar on the implications of the groundbreaking Schrems II

On 29 October at 11 am, Stibbe organises a webinar on the implications of the groundbreaking Schrems II decision which annulled the U.S. Privacy Shield and questioned the standard contractual clauses. We will elaborate on the remaining options for international personal data transfers outside of the E.U.”

Lire la suiteStibbe organises a webinar on the implications of the groundbreaking Schrems II

Le nouveau « congé parental corona » est arrivé : chômage temporaire pour absence de services de garde d’enfants.

Le régime de congé parental corona a cessé de s'appliquer le 1er octobre 2020. Cependant, alors que la deuxième vague du coronavirus menace de mener à la fermeture (partielle) de plusieurs écoles et institutions, de nombreux parents sont inquiets. Le nouveau gouvernement De Croo avait toutefois déjà prévu une première mesure sociale comme solution dans l'accord de coalition.

Lire la suiteLe nouveau « congé parental corona » est arrivé : chômage temporaire pour absence de services de garde d’enfants.

Proxy Decrees adopted during COVID-19 crisis: practical points of attention for the in-house lawyer

The ongoing COVID-19 crisis has affected all aspects of our daily lives. For in-house lawyers, it is important to keep an overview during these turbulent times. In any case, the regulator does not make things any easier for in-house lawyers with the multitude of regulatory initiatives in response to this crisis. The various federal initiatives are discussed below.

On 30 March 2020, the two laws of 27 March 2020, empowering the federal executive power to take measures to combat the spread of the coronavirus (hereafter: “Special Proxy Law I” and “Special Proxy Law II”, collectively the “Special Proxy Laws”), were published in the Belgian Official Journal. These Special Proxy Laws gave the federal executive power the power to amend existing laws in certain matters and under certain conditions by royal decree until 30 June 2020, in order to respond adequately and in a timely manner to the various challenges brought by the COVID-19 pandemic.

This article reflects on the practical points of attention in this respect, and explains the impact of the proxy decrees on the daily practice of in-house lawyers.

Lire la suiteProxy Decrees adopted during COVID-19 crisis: practical points of attention for the in-house lawyer

The EU Copyright Directive: the three most controversial provisions

In April 2019, after years of debate and a rather controversial EU legislative process, the Directive (EU) 2019/790 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market (hereafter referred to as the Copyright Directive) was finally adopted. The purpose of this directive was to adapt copyright protection to the digital age in order to create an internal market for digital content and services. Three specific targets were set: (1) to adapt exceptions to reflect the digital and cross-border environment (2) to ensure wider access to content, and (3) to achieve a well-functioning marketplace for copyright.

Lire la suiteThe EU Copyright Directive: the three most controversial provisions

Rgpd : Importance de la transparence et impact sur la validité de la preuve

Plus de deux ans après l’entrée en application du RGPD, le principe de transparence qu’il consacre conserve une grande importance. Il est crucial de mettre à jour de façon régulière la notice d’information pour veiller à l’adapter à l’évolution de l’entreprise et de la jurisprudence des autorités nationales de protection des données.

Lire la suiteRgpd : Importance de la transparence et impact sur la validité de la preuve

Co-ownership: Majorities and (un)certainties in the event of complete demolition and reconstruction

Plot demolition and reconstruction are far reaching infringements of property rights. It is not self-evident that they can be forced on (co-)owners without their consent. Yet this is the path that the legislator followed in 2018, when the possibility of a four-fifths majority decision was introduced in the general assembly (‘algemene vergadering’) to proceed with the demolition or reconstruction of a plot. However, the Constitutional Court pulled the brakes with a 20 February 2020 ruling, legislating that infringements of property rights must be proportional and necessary in light of the objective pursued. Additional safeguards were therefore introduced by the law of 31 July 2020 to protect that right.

Lire la suiteCo-ownership: Majorities and (un)certainties in the event of complete demolition and reconstruction

Do’s and don’ts in the event of a crisis situation within a company

Companies shouldn't ask themselves if they will ever be faced with a crisis but rather when this will be the case. Modern means of communication present a vast number of opportunities but also entail a wide variety of risks. Managing these risks requires special attention. Without arguing for a moun-tain of paperwork and red tape, we believe it's important for each company to have at least the ap-propriate internal procedures and mechanisms to manage the risks it faces.

Lire la suiteDo’s and don’ts in the event of a crisis situation within a company

Time registration obligation: what if you do not have one (yet)?

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled in a 14 May 2019 judgment that Member States should provide for mandatory time recording in their legislation. Although Belgium does not have such an obligation so far, the Court’s judgment is not without consequences. This is already evident from a 22 May 2020 judgment by the Labour Court of Brussels, according to which, an employer without a time registration system can no longer assume a purely passive role when an employee claims overtime arrears (without sufficient proof due to a lack of time registration data). The employer will itself have to provide the necessary evidence to dismiss the claim or will risk an order to pay the claimed amount.

Lire la suiteTime registration obligation: what if you do not have one (yet)?

Revival of enforcement against vertical relationships may call for a rethink of distribution practices

A €40 million fine was imposed on a clothing company for a new type of competition law infringement as well as behaviour long recognized to constitute a hardcore infringement. The European Commission's Guess decision reflects the current renewed interest in taking enforcement action against vertical agreements and in adapting the competition rules to new business practices.

Lire la suiteRevival of enforcement against vertical relationships may call for a rethink of distribution practices